Revolvers and magazine capacity
I guess I’m getting old when I have to refer to my years of chatting on gun boards because they seem to be something from so far in the past now. Blogging and tweeting and Facebook seem to have replaced the discussion forum format. I have watched so many of my friends transition from full size autos to small Kahr semi-autos and the Ruger LCP. The .380 is still revered as underpowered, but when most people think about the likely hood of dealing with a threat and how much firepower they will need and how much weight they want to tote around, people are going with smaller firearms.
I’m not in the camp that thinks that the smallest caliber gun is fine, but if that’s what you want to carry, I won’t condemn it, but you better train to be able to fight with it. One discussion that still rings in my ears from the gun forum years was that the 1911 pistol was out dated because magazine capacity was only 7 or 8 rounds while most modern 9mm service guns held 13-19rds. Wilson Combat magazines have made the firearm more reliable, but it’s still a very heavy gun. Magazine capacity was the big thing in the 1990s but not so much anymore. Most Police now have quick access to an M4 and over loading a handgun seems to be a thing of the past. Do people still look down a 5 shot revolver now that all of those .380 pistols only hold 5 – 7 rounds?