tactical pants and consistancy
I’ve been wearing Eotac tactical pants and shorts for almost 2 yrs now. I’ve seen only one real production change since I’ve been wearing them and that pretty much proves that Eotac got it right with their line of tactical pants. Some of the early production pants were a little tight in the thighs but I never noticed this problem since I’m not a body building (the only people that noticed). I really like the fit compared to the 5.11 tactical pants I use to wear primarily because they don’t ride up in the seat. I think that is the most common complaint I get from customers when they call and ask about various tactical pants that we sell.
The Style 202 are my favorite pants to wear for fall and winter weather. At first glance, most of the tactical pants out there look the same, but just like many of the firearms that we see in the industry, some of it just comes down to preference. I find some of the tactical pants made by Blackhawk and Proper to be a little overly designed, and I don’t need pockets in many of the places that some manufacturers are placing them. They Style 202 pants have them were I need them and they are designed to the proper dimensions. It always bothered me that so many shirts and pants had basically flat dimensions and you couldn’t really fit much in them. This became an issue with many of the tactical shirts I have worn especially when it came to using notepads. If the notepad was full, my Woolrich Elite shirt face pockets couldn’t fit it and I’d have to place my notepad in the inner pockets. All of the Eotac shirts and pants have bellowed pockets that aren’t bulging, but give you about another 30% for putting more in a pocket, without adding more and more pockets to a design. There can be too many pockets on tactical clothing.